Question

Difficulty: HardCentral Ideas

For centuries, economists asserted that money emerged naturally to resolve the inefficiencies of barter, wherein individuals struggled to find trade partners with matching needs. Anthropological evidence, however, challenges this foundational narrative. Researchers like Caroline Humphrey have noted that no historical society has ever been documented operating a pure barter economy. Instead, early community transactions were sustained by dense networks of social credit and gift-exchange, where goods were shared with the implicit understanding of future reciprocity. Money did not arise to simplify spot transactions between strangers; rather, it was introduced much later, often by centralized authorities seeking to standardize debt obligations and facilitate taxation.

Which choice best states the main idea of the text?

  1. A
    Early human societies deliberately avoided barter transactions because they recognized that social credit systems were inherently more stable and less prone to economic collapse.
  2. B
    Economists and anthropologists hold fundamentally irreconcilable views regarding the structural organization and evolution of all ancient trade systems.
  3. Anthropological research refutes the traditional economic theory that currency developed as a solution to barter, suggesting instead that early economies functioned through credit and social reciprocity.Answer
  4. D
    Centralized authorities created early money to help local communities manage their complex networks of informal gift-exchanges more efficiently.

Answer

Anthropological research refutes the traditional economic theory that currency developed as a solution to barter, suggesting instead that early economies functioned through credit and social reciprocity.
The correct option accurately captures the main focus of the text: it outlines the traditional economic theory of money's origin (solving barter) and explains how anthropological evidence refutes it, pointing instead to credit networks and gift-exchange as the true precursor to currency.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the text structure and shift in perspective.
The text begins with a traditional view (money solved barter inefficiencies) and then introduces a counterargument ('Anthropological evidence, however, challenges this...').
Identifying the transition helps isolate the core argument of the author, which opposes the traditional barter model.
2
Evaluate the details supporting the counterargument.
The passage highlights that no pure barter society existed, that early transactions relied on networks of social credit and gift-exchange, and that money was introduced later by authorities for taxation and debt standardization.
This establishes that early economies were based on credit rather than barter systems.
3
Synthesize the main idea and match it with the correct choice.
The main idea combines the debunking of the barter origin story with the explanation that social credit systems preceded money.
This synthesis directly aligns with the option indicating that anthropological research refutes the barter-to-currency theory in favor of credit and reciprocity.

Key Concept

Identifying the central idea of a passage by evaluating contrasting arguments and supporting details.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question