Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardCross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Text 1
Archaeogeneticist Dr. Amit Patel argues that the spread of agriculture into Europe during the Early Neolithic was driven primarily by a massive migration of Anatolian farmers who physically displaced local hunter-gatherers. Patel points to ancient DNA showing a sudden, widespread influx of Near Eastern ancestry in early European farming sites, suggesting that indigenous foraging populations contributed minimally to the initial agricultural economy.

Text 2
Anthropologist Dr. Clara Murchison argues that the migration-driven model oversimplifies the Neolithic transition. She highlights archaeological evidence from Baltic coastal sites, where indigenous hunter-gatherers maintained active trade networks with farming groups for centuries, gradually adopting crop cultivation and pottery while retaining their distinct genetic profiles. Murchison contends that agricultural expansion was a localized, variable process of cultural diffusion rather than a singular demographic wave.

Based on the passages, how would Murchison (Text 2) most likely respond to Patel's characterization of the agricultural transition in Europe (Text 1)?

  1. A
    By claiming that ancient genomic data are inherently unreliable for tracing the movements of early human populations across different geographic areas.
  2. By asserting that archaeological evidence from specific regions reveals a gradual process of cultural adoption that contradicts the idea of a uniform displacement of indigenous populations.Answer
  3. C
    By suggesting that Near Eastern farmers did not migrate into Europe at all, but rather that agricultural techniques spread solely through trade networks.
  4. D
    By arguing that early European hunter-gatherers actively resisted adopting farming practices due to cultural differences with Anatolian migrants.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that Murchison would respond by asserting that archaeological evidence from specific regions reveals a gradual process of cultural adoption that contradicts the idea of a uniform displacement of indigenous populations.
The author of Text 2 describes a situation in the Baltic region where local hunter-gatherers adopted agricultural practices (like crop cultivation and pottery) gradually through trade, while retaining their unique genetic profiles. This evidence of localized cultural diffusion directly challenges the claim in Text 1 that agricultural expansion was driven by a uniform, massive migration that physically displaced local hunter-gatherers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main argument and evidence presented in Text 1.
Text 1 claims that the Neolithic transition in Europe was driven by a massive migration of Anatolian farmers who physically displaced local hunter-gatherers, supported by genetic data showing an influx of Near Eastern ancestry.
Understanding the first author's perspective is necessary before determining how the second author would respond to it.
2
Identify the main argument and evidence presented in Text 2.
Text 2 argues that this migration model oversimplifies the transition, presenting Baltic archaeological evidence of hunter-gatherers adopting farming gradually through trade while retaining their distinct genetic profiles.
Analyzing the second author's perspective reveals the counter-arguments and qualifications they bring to the topic.
3
Synthesize the relationship between the two texts to determine the response.
Text 2 opposes the idea of uniform displacement by showing that in some regions, the transition occurred through cultural diffusion rather than complete demographic replacement.
This directly answers the prompt by linking Text 2's evidence to a limitation in Text 1's claim.

Key Concept

Synthesizing the relational links and perspectives between two academic texts on the same topic.
Rate this question

Topics

Cross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

More questions from this topic