While preparing a presentation on cognitive linguistics, a student takes the following notes:
* Cognitive scientist Dr. Liam Vance studied spatial memory in speakers of absolute frame-of-reference (FoR) languages, which describe space using cardinal directions (north, south, etc.), and relative FoR languages, which use egocentric terms (left, right, etc.).
* Vance conducted an experiment where participants observed three objects aligned in a north-to-south sequence on a table in a windowless room.
* Participants were then rotated 180 degrees and asked to recreate the sequence on an identical table facing the opposite direction.
* Relative FoR speakers reversed the cardinal orientation of the sequence to match their own rotated body orientation (e.g., placing the objects south-to-north).
* Absolute FoR speakers reconstructed the sequence in the exact north-to-south orientation as the original layout, despite having no access to compasses or outdoor visual cues.
Which choice best uses information from the notes to support the claim that speakers of absolute FoR languages maintain an internal, continuous cognitive track of cardinal orientation that is independent of external directional indicators?
- Although they were rotated 180 degrees in a windowless room with no access to compasses or outdoor visual cues, absolute FoR speakers successfully reconstructed the original north-to-south layout.Answer
- BUnlike absolute FoR speakers, relative FoR speakers reversed the cardinal alignment of the objects to south-to-north, aligning the recreation with their new physical facing.
- CBecause absolute FoR languages require speakers to constantly declare their position relative to the landscape, these speakers develop a heightened sensory awareness of magnetic fields.
- DAbsolute FoR languages utilize cardinal directions like north and south to describe spatial relationships, whereas relative FoR languages describe space relative to the speaker's body using terms like left and right.