Text 1
Traditional models of socio-cultural evolution assert that agricultural surpluses are a prerequisite for the organization of labor required to construct monumental architecture. However, archaeologist Dr. Aris Thorne argues that the temple complex at Göbekli Tepe, built by hunter-gatherers before the rise of farming, reverses this trajectory. Thorne proposes that the shared ritual activity of constructing massive stone pillars served as the primary catalyst for social cohesion, which subsequently drove the transition to agriculture to feed the congregating builders. Thus, monumental architecture was the cause, rather than the effect, of sedentism and agriculture.
Text 2
While acknowledging the impressive scale of Göbekli Tepe, sociologist Dr. Clara Vance contends that attributing its construction entirely to mobile hunter-gatherers overlooks the logistical realities of such an undertaking. Vance argues that a sustained workforce, even if motivated by shared ritual, requires a predictable food supply that transient hunting and gathering cannot reliably provide. She suggests that proto-agricultural practices—such as the intensive harvesting of wild grains, which did not yet constitute full-scale farming but created localized resource abundance—must have already been established in the region to support the builders during construction.
Based on the texts, how would Vance (Text 2) most likely characterize Thorne's claim in Text 1 regarding the relationship between the construction of Göbekli Tepe and the transition to agriculture?
- As overlooking the necessity of pre-existing, localized food-gathering strategies to sustain the labor force during the construction process.Answer
- BAs a persuasive refutation of the traditional model of socio-cultural evolution.
- CAs supported by archaeological evidence that wild grain harvesting began only after the stone pillars were erected.
- DAs an accurate depiction of how shared religious devotion can entirely replace the need for a stable food supply.