Historians have long debated the primary motivation behind the construction of the mid-ninth-century temples in Java. While traditional interpretations assert these monuments served as overt projections of imperial hegemony by the ruling Sailendra dynasty, recent spatial analyses of surrounding agrarian settlements suggest a more cooperative impetus. By demonstrating that temple construction coincided with local infrastructure improvements managed by regional elites rather than royal decree, researchers have proposed that the temples functioned as hubs of community-led economic integration. Consequently, the monuments are best understood not as unilateral declarations of royal power, but as collaborative endeavors that consolidated regional networks.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- AArchaeological evidence from Southeast Asia demonstrates that ancient monumental architecture was primarily driven by economic cooperation rather than political control.
- BLocal elites constructed ninth-century Javanese temples in direct defiance of royal decrees issued by the ruling Sailendra dynasty.
- Recent research suggests that mid-ninth-century Javanese temples were built through regional collaboration to support local networks, rather than solely as displays of imperial authority.Answer
- DThe Sailendra dynasty intentionally decentralized its political authority to foster community-led economic integration in Javanese settlements.