Many historians of technology argue that the widespread adoption of the printing press in fifteenth-century Europe did not immediately democratize knowledge, pointing to the persistent high cost of paper and low literacy rates. However, historian Elena Vance argues that focusing solely on direct literacy overlooks the secondary pathways through which print transformed society. She notes that even illiterate individuals frequently gathered in public squares to hear printed pamphlets read aloud by local officials. Consequently, Vance contends that the early print revolution's social reach should be measured by acoustic transmission rather than individual reading capabilities. This framework suggests that the impact of new media is often structural rather than personal, altering collective communication habits before it changes individual skills.
Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence in the text as a whole?
- It presents an observation of a historical practice to support Vance's claim that print media had social effects beyond direct readership.Answer
- BIt outlines the primary historical argument that Vance's research aims to disprove concerning the democratizing power of the printing press.
- CIt details a method by which local officials restricted public access to printed information in fifteenth-century Europe.
- DIt offers an inference about how acoustic communication eventually enabled illiterate populations to develop individual reading skills.