Question

Difficulty: EasyCross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Text 1
Many conservationists argue that offshore wind farms are highly detrimental to delicate marine ecosystems. They point out that the loud underwater noise generated during construction severely disrupts the communication patterns of marine mammals. Furthermore, they claim that the physical turbine foundations permanently alter local currents, thereby displacing native fish species from their natural feeding habitats. As a result, these conservationists advocate for suspending new offshore energy projects.

Text 2
While the initial construction of offshore wind turbines does temporarily disturb marine life, long-term ecological monitoring shows that the underwater structures quickly begin to function as artificial reefs. These artificial reefs attract a wide variety of fish and invertebrate species. Consequently, the presence of these turbines ultimately leads to a significant increase in local biodiversity. Therefore, the long-term ecological benefits of wind farms outweigh the short-term disturbances.

Based on the passages, is the statement that the author of Text 2 would respond to the claim in Text 1 that wind turbines permanently displace native fish by arguing that these turbines actually attract and support fish populations over time true or false?

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is true.
The correct answer is that the statement is true. Text 1 asserts that turbine foundations permanently displace native fish. Text 2 counters this by showing that the turbines act as artificial reefs, attracting diverse fish species and increasing biodiversity, thereby demonstrating that they support fish populations over time.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Text 1 to locate the specific claim about native fish populations.
Text 1 claims that the physical turbine foundations permanently displace native fish from their feeding habitats.
This establishes the point of comparison to see how the second author responds.
2
Analyze Text 2 to see the findings on turbine structures and fish populations.
Text 2 states that the turbine structures function as artificial reefs that attract a wide variety of fish and increase local biodiversity.
This clarifies the perspective of the author of Text 2 regarding the impact on fish.
3
Determine if the statement accurately describes the relationship between the two viewpoints.
Since Text 2 highlights that turbines attract and support fish over time, the author of Text 2 would indeed counter Text 1's claim of permanent displacement with this point, making the statement true.
This synthesized comparison yields the correct response.

Key Concept

Cross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis
Estimated Time:45s
Rate this question