Question

Difficulty: MediumCross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison

Text 1
Many art historians argue that the Upper Paleolithic cave paintings in Lascaux, France, were created primarily for ritualistic or shamanic purposes, serving as sacred spaces to facilitate hunting magic. According to this view, the detailed depictions of game animals were intended to supernaturally ensure successful hunts. Proponents point to the deep, inaccessible locations of the paintings within the caves as evidence that they were not meant for everyday viewing, but rather for private, mystical ceremonies.

Text 2
Conversely, archaeologist Dale Guthrie suggests that the Lascaux cave art represents a secular, mundane activity: the creative output of Paleolithic adolescents. Guthrie argues that the abundance of drawings depicting large, dangerous mammals, along with incomplete sketches and graffiti-like marks, matches the themes and style typical of youth art across cultures. Furthermore, fossilized footprints found in the caves belong predominantly to adolescents and children, indicating these spaces were frequently accessed by youths rather than reserved exclusively for select spiritual leaders.

Based on the passages, how would Guthrie (Text 2) most likely respond to the claim of the art historians in Text 1 regarding the significance of the cave paintings' locations?

  1. A
    By arguing that the physical hazards of deep cave chambers would have prevented adolescents from safely gathering there.
  2. B
    By asserting that the deep chambers were chosen for their acoustic properties rather than their visual isolation.
  3. By pointing out that fossil evidence indicates these spaces were regularly accessed by young people rather than restricted to spiritual elites.Answer
  4. D
    By conceding that the deep locations suggest a sacred function while maintaining that adolescents performed the rituals.

Answer

The author of Text 2 would respond by pointing out that fossilized footprints indicate these spaces were regularly accessed by young people rather than restricted to spiritual elites.
The correct answer explains that Guthrie uses the evidence of fossilized footprints belonging to children and adolescents to show that the deep cave areas were frequently accessed by youth, thereby challenging the art historians' assertion that the remote locations indicate they were reserved exclusively for select spiritual ceremonies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the claim of the art historians in Text 1 regarding the cave locations.
The art historians claim that the deep, inaccessible locations of the paintings indicate they were reserved for private, mystical ceremonies and not everyday viewing.
This establishes the perspective that Guthrie will respond to.
2
Identify Guthrie's counter-evidence in Text 2 concerning the use of these cave spaces.
Guthrie notes that the fossilized footprints found in the caves belong mostly to children and adolescents, showing these deep areas were frequently accessed by youths.
This details the specific factual counterpoint presented in the second text.
3
Determine how Guthrie's evidence directly challenges the art historians' claim.
Because youths regularly accessed the deep areas, the spaces could not have been restricted exclusively to select spiritual leaders for private rituals, directly undermining the art historians' interpretation of the locations.
This synthesizes the two perspectives to find the correct relational stance.

Key Concept

Analyzing cross-text connections to evaluate how one author's findings challenge a claim made by another author.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question