Text 1
Many art historians argue that the Upper Paleolithic cave paintings in Lascaux, France, were created primarily for ritualistic or shamanic purposes, serving as sacred spaces to facilitate hunting magic. According to this view, the detailed depictions of game animals were intended to supernaturally ensure successful hunts. Proponents point to the deep, inaccessible locations of the paintings within the caves as evidence that they were not meant for everyday viewing, but rather for private, mystical ceremonies.
Text 2
Conversely, archaeologist Dale Guthrie suggests that the Lascaux cave art represents a secular, mundane activity: the creative output of Paleolithic adolescents. Guthrie argues that the abundance of drawings depicting large, dangerous mammals, along with incomplete sketches and graffiti-like marks, matches the themes and style typical of youth art across cultures. Furthermore, fossilized footprints found in the caves belong predominantly to adolescents and children, indicating these spaces were frequently accessed by youths rather than reserved exclusively for select spiritual leaders.
Based on the passages, how would Guthrie (Text 2) most likely respond to the claim of the art historians in Text 1 regarding the significance of the cave paintings' locations?
- ABy arguing that the physical hazards of deep cave chambers would have prevented adolescents from safely gathering there.
- BBy asserting that the deep chambers were chosen for their acoustic properties rather than their visual isolation.
- By pointing out that fossil evidence indicates these spaces were regularly accessed by young people rather than restricted to spiritual elites.Answer
- DBy conceding that the deep locations suggest a sacred function while maintaining that adolescents performed the rituals.