A registered representative receives a non-discretionary customer order from an institutional client to buy 250,000 shares of a thinly traded equity security. Before submitting the client's trade to the market, the representative buys 2,000 shares of the same security for their personal account in anticipation of price movement caused by the institutional order. Which of the following best characterizes this scenario and the regulatory framework governing it?
- This activity constitutes front-running, a prohibited practice under FINRA rules, and the self-regulatory organization (SRO) has the authority to investigate and discipline the representative.Answer
- BThis activity constitutes wash trading because the representative entered orders to create a false impression of trading volume without taking genuine market risk.
- CThis activity constitutes front-running, but FINRA lacks jurisdiction to sanction the representative unless the SEC first secures a criminal conviction.
- DThis activity is permissible trading strategy provided the representative executed their personal purchase in a principal dealer capacity rather than an agency broker capacity.
Answer
The scenario describes front-running, which is a violation of SRO rules, and FINRA has full authority to investigate and impose regulatory sanctions on registered representatives for such misconduct.
Front-running occurs when a registered representative executes a order for their own account while in possession of material, non-public information about an impending customer block trade. FINRA, operating as an SRO under SEC oversight, has explicit authority to investigate, fine, suspend, or bar associated persons who violate these ethical trading rules.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Front-running rules and SRO enforcement authority
Estimated Time:2m 0s