A financial holding company owns both a FINRA-member broker-dealer and a state-chartered commercial bank. A non-registered employee who works exclusively within the commercial bank's consumer savings division is suspected of misappropriating funds from bank deposit accounts. Which of the following statements correctly describes FINRA's regulatory jurisdiction over this matter?
- FINRA lacks jurisdiction over the employee and the banking division because its regulatory authority is restricted to member firms, associated persons, and securities-related activities.Answer
- BFINRA has statutory authority to examine the commercial banking division and bar the employee because FINRA regulates all financial subsidiaries under a broker-dealer's holding company.
- CFINRA can initiate criminal prosecution and issue subpoenas to non-registered banking staff, provided any final disciplinary censure is submitted to the SEC for approval.
- DFINRA assumes jurisdiction over the banking employee only if the bank acted as a principal dealer by buying securities directly from the customer's savings account.
Answer
FINRA lacks jurisdiction over the employee and the banking division because its regulatory authority is restricted to member firms, associated persons, and securities-related activities.
As a Self-Regulatory Organization (SRO), FINRA's enforcement authority is strictly defined by membership and association. It governs member broker-dealers, registered representatives, and securities business. Commercial bank deposit operations and non-registered bank employees fall outside FINRA's regulatory umbrella and are instead governed by banking regulators such as the FDIC, OCC, or state banking departments.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
FINRA SRO Jurisdiction vs. Commercial Banking Oversight
Estimated Time:1m 40s