A U.S.-based investor holding a selection of European equities denominated in euros () decides to double the number of stocks in the portfolio from 15 to 30 companies across various Eurozone market sectors to protect against exchange rate losses. During the year, the euro depreciates significantly against the U.S. dollar (), reducing the investor's total return upon conversion back to U.S. dollars. Which of the following best explains why expanding the portfolio's equity holdings failed to protect the investor from foreign exchange losses?
- Currency risk is a systematic risk for foreign holdings that affects all assets denominated in that currency and cannot be eliminated through asset diversification.Answer
- BAdding additional individual equities within the same monetary zone eliminates currency volatility once the portfolio expands beyond 25 distinct security positions.
- CEquity prices automatically rise in direct proportion to foreign currency devaluation to maintain constant yield curve parity with domestic bonds.
- DCurrency risk represents an issuer-specific credit default hazard that applies exclusively to fixed-income instruments rather than equity shares.
Answer
Currency risk is a systematic risk for foreign holdings that affects all assets denominated in that currency and cannot be eliminated through asset diversification.
Currency risk is a form of systematic (market) risk that affects all investments priced in a foreign currency. Because all 30 equities are denominated in euros, a drop in the euro's value relative to the U.S. dollar reduces converted returns across the entire portfolio. Adding more individual company holdings reduces business-specific risk but cannot eliminate systemic exchange rate exposure.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Currency Risk as a Systematic Risk