Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardGifts, Gratuities, Political Contributions, and Outside Business Activities

A registered representative purchases two luxury box seats to a national sports championship for 350each(350 each ( 700 total). The representative presents both tickets to a primary portfolio manager of an institutional account to foster client goodwill. Due to a prior personal obligation, the representative does not accompany the portfolio manager to the event. Which of the following statements correctly evaluates this scenario under SRO rules?

  1. The distribution of tickets constitutes a violation of FINRA Rule 3220 because the representative did not attend the event, classifying the tickets as a gift that exceeds the $100 annual cap per recipient.Answer
  2. B
    The ticket purchase automatically triggers a two-year ban on the broker-dealer engaging in municipal or institutional underwriting business with the client under pay-to-play regulations.
  3. C
    The transaction is fully exempt from FINRA oversight because self-regulatory organizations lack jurisdiction over corporate gift giving, which falls exclusively under SEC criminal enforcement.
  4. D
    The transaction is compliant with SRO regulations because entertainment events and sporting event tickets are categorized as ordinary business expenses, regardless of whether the registered representative attends.

Answer

The distribution of tickets constitutes a violation of FINRA Rule 3220 because the representative did not attend the event, classifying the tickets as a gift that exceeds the $100 annual cap per recipient.
Under FINRA Rule 3220 (Gifts and Gratuities), registered representatives are restricted from giving gifts in excess of 100perindividualperyeartoanypersonifthegiftrelatestothebusinessoftherecipient′semployer.Whileordinarybusinessentertainment(suchasmealsorsportingevents)ispermittedbeyond100 per individual per year to any person if the gift relates to the business of the recipient's employer. While ordinary business entertainment (such as meals or sporting events) is permitted beyond 100, this exception requires the registered representative to host and attend the event alongside the client. Because the representative did not attend the game, the full 700valueoftheticketsisclassifiedasanunconditionalgift,violatingthe700 value of the tickets is classified as an unconditional gift, violating the 100 annual threshold.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the nature of the expenditure (gift vs. business entertainment).
Because the registered representative did not attend the sporting event, the tickets cannot be classified as business entertainment. They are treated as an unconditional gift.
SRO rules mandate that for an item/event to qualify as business entertainment (which is exempt from the $100 gift limit), the associated representative must host and physically attend the event with the guest.
2
Compare the value of the gift to regulatory thresholds under FINRA Rule 3220.
The total value of 700(700 ( 350 x 2) given to an individual in a single year substantially exceeds the FINRA Rule 3220 annual limit of $100 per person.
FINRA Rule 3220 sets a strict $100 per person per year cap on gifts given in connection with the business of the recipient's employer.
3
Determine compliance status based on SRO rules.
The representative has committed a violation of FINRA Rule 3220.
Exceeding the annual $100 gift limit without qualifying for the business entertainment exception violates FINRA conduct regulations.

Key Concept

FINRA Rule 3220 (Gifts and Gratuities) and Business Entertainment Attendance Exception
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Gifts, Gratuities, Political Contributions, and Outside Business Activities