A registered representative at a broker-dealer hosts a business dinner costing $300 per person for three executives of an institutional client to discuss upcoming underwriting services. The representative attends the dinner in full and pays for the expense through the broker-dealer's corporate account. Under FINRA rules and guidance governing gifts, gratuities, and business entertainment, which of the following statements correctly describes the regulatory treatment of this expenditure?
- The dinner is treated as legitimate business entertainment rather than a gift, provided the representative attends and the expenditure complies with the broker-dealer's supervisory policies.Answer
- BThe expenditure is a violation of FINRA rules because any meal or entertainment benefit exceeding $100 per recipient is strictly prohibited.
- CThe expenditure triggers an automatic two-year ban on municipal underwriting business under federal pay-to-play regulations.
- DThe expenditure is permitted only if the representative obtains prior written authorization and regulatory clearance from FINRA.
Answer
The expenditure is classified as legitimate business entertainment rather than a gift, provided the registered representative attends the event and it complies with the member firm's internal supervisory procedures.
Under FINRA Rule 3220 and related regulatory guidance, when an associated person accompanies a client to an event (such as a dinner, show, or sporting event), the activity is treated as business entertainment rather than a gift. Business entertainment is not subject to the statutory $100 annual gift limit, provided the entertainment is neither so frequent nor so extensive as to raise questions of propriety, and aligns with the firm's written supervisory procedures.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Distinction Between Gifts ($100 Limit) and Hosted Business Entertainment under FINRA Rule 3220