Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumPublic Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

A tier-2 heritage city is experiencing severe air quality degradation, largely attributed to 5,000 aging diesel mini-buses operated by small, individual private operators. The municipal corporation proposes an immediate policy to mandate zero-emission electric buses within six months. However, an administrative feasibility assessment highlights three major constraints: individual operators lack capital for EV purchases, charging stations are currently non-existent along feeder routes, and an abrupt transit shutdown would paralyze daily wage commuters. Which of the following policy implementation strategies represents the most balanced and administratively feasible course of action?

  1. Adopt a phased transition policy offering concessional green loans and public-private charging hubs, while permitting compliant existing buses to operate until the end of their statutory service lifespan.Answer
  2. B
    Issue an immediate administrative decree banning all diesel mini-buses within city limits after thirty days and impound non-compliant vehicles to achieve zero emissions strictly.
  3. C
    Scrap the public mini-bus network entirely and subsidize private electric two-wheelers for commuters, assuming individual motorized transport is superior for heritage city corridors.
  4. D
    Postpone all emissions regulations indefinitely, reasoning that local vehicle emissions are irrelevant because national industrial pollution levels are factually higher.

Answer

The most administrative and socio-economically feasible strategy is to adopt a phased transition policy offering concessional green loans and public-private charging hubs while permitting compliant existing buses to run until statutory retirement.
The choice advocating a phased transition policy offering concessional green loans and public-private charging hubs while permitting compliant existing buses to operate until the end of their service lifespan successfully balances financial feasibility, infrastructure readiness, and public interest. It ensures environmental compliance without causing economic collapse for operators or transit paralysis for wage workers.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze policy constraints and stakeholder dynamics.
Identified key bottlenecks: capital deficiency among operators, infrastructure deficit (lack of chargers), and risk of severe commuter disruption.
Effective policy feasibility requires addressing financial, technical, and social constraints simultaneously.
2
Evaluate policy alternatives against sustainability and administrative feasibility criteria.
The phased transition model provides financial support, allows infrastructure setup time, and avoids public transit paralysis.
Administrative decisions must balance long-term regulatory compliance with immediate social stability.

Key Concept

Public Policy Feasibility and Stakeholder Impact Analysis
Rate this question

Topics

Public Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

More questions from this topic