Evaluate the following assertions and the subsequent logical deductions to determine which inference validly holds true.
Statements:
1. Every newly recruited inspector is required to complete a six-week physical training module.
2. Rahul is a newly recruited inspector.
Conclusions:
I. Rahul is required to complete a six-week physical training module.
II. Rahul has successfully passed the physical training module.
Which of the following options correctly identifies the valid conclusion(s)?
- Only conclusion I followsAnswer
- BOnly conclusion II follows
- CBoth conclusions I and II follow
- DNeither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
Answer
The option stating that only conclusion I follows is the correct answer.
The correct answer accurately identifies that only the first conclusion is a valid logical deduction. Statement 1 establishes a rule for all newly recruited inspectors, and Statement 2 confirms Rahul is in this category. Applying basic syllogism, the rule must apply to Rahul. The second conclusion is an assumption about an event (passing the module) that is not supported by the given text.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Statement and Conclusions or Inferences