With reference to the official methodology of poverty estimation in India, consider the following statements:
1. The C. Rangarajan Committee (2014) proposed poverty lines based on nutritional norms including protein and fat intake in addition to calories, alongside essential non-food expenses.
2. The Suresh Tendulkar Committee (2009) moved away from the uniform calorie anchor and used implicit private expenditure on health and education to determine poverty lines.
3. The National Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) published by NITI Aayog relies primarily on the Household Consumer Expenditure Survey conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO).
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1 and 2 onlyAnswer
- B1 only
- C2 and 3 only
- D1, 2, and 3
Answer
Statements 1 and 2 are correct, while Statement 3 is incorrect.
The statement combination containing 1 and 2 only is correct. The Rangarajan Committee incorporated a comprehensive nutritional basket (calories, proteins, and fats) along with essential non-food components. The Tendulkar Committee abandoned the strict calorie anchor used by the Alagh and Lakdawala committees, adjusting the poverty line to reflect expenditure on health and education. Statement 3 is false because NITI Aayog utilizes National Family Health Survey (NFHS) data for computing the National MPI across health, education, and standard of living dimensions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Methodological differences between Expert Committees (Tendulkar, Rangarajan) and data sources for Multidimensional Poverty Index in India.