Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumStatement and Conclusions or Inferences

Based on the statements provided below, evaluate the logical validity of Conclusion I and Conclusion II.

Statement 1: The national medical council's regulatory framework dictates that artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic tools shall be used solely as secondary evaluation mechanisms and must not be the singular basis for prescribing invasive medical procedures.
Statement 2: Several elite healthcare facilities have recently deployed 'Cardio-AI', a state-of-the-art diagnostic system, into their cardiology departments to assess patient risk.

Conclusion I: 'Cardio-AI' cannot be the only mechanism used by these healthcare facilities to approve open-heart surgery for their patients.
Conclusion II: The national medical council has concluded that AI diagnostic tools are fundamentally unreliable and pose a severe threat to patients.

Which of the given options represents the correct logical deduction?

  1. A
    Only II follows
  2. Only I followsAnswer
  3. C
    Neither I nor II follows
  4. D
    Both I and II follow

Answer

Only I follows
The correct answer accurately validates only the first conclusion. Conclusion I is a direct logical inference because open-heart surgery is inherently an 'invasive medical procedure', and the first statement explicitly restricts AI tools from being the sole basis for prescribing such procedures. Conclusion II is invalid because it makes an extreme, unwarranted assumption that goes far beyond the text; regulating a tool as a secondary mechanism does not logically imply the council views it as fundamentally unreliable or dangerous.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement 1 to establish the regulatory constraint on AI tools.
AI tools cannot be the sole basis for prescribing invasive medical procedures.
To understand the exact limitation placed on the use of AI in these healthcare settings.
2
Analyze Statement 2 and apply the constraint to Conclusion I.
Since open-heart surgery is clearly an invasive medical procedure, Cardio-AI cannot be the singular basis for its approval. Thus, Conclusion I is logically valid.
To determine if Conclusion I is a direct logical deduction from combining the given premises.
3
Evaluate Conclusion II against the provided text.
The text restricts AI to 'secondary evaluation mechanisms', but it does not state or imply that AI is 'fundamentally unreliable' or a 'severe threat'. Conclusion II is invalid.
To check if Conclusion II is supported by the facts or if it is an unwarranted, extreme exaggeration.

Key Concept

Statement and Conclusions or Inferences
Rate this question

Topics

Statement and Conclusions or Inferences

More questions from this topic