Read the given statements and determine which of the conclusions can be logically drawn from them.
Statement I: According to the new administrative guidelines, any public grievance petition that remains pending for more than 45 days is automatically escalated to the State Vigilance Commission.
Statement II: A significant number of petitions regarding rural water supply have remained unresolved for the past two months.
Conclusion I: Several petitions related to rural water supply will be escalated to the State Vigilance Commission.
Conclusion II: The department handling rural water supply is the most inefficient department in the state administration.
Which of the following options is correct?
- Only Conclusion I followsAnswer
- BOnly Conclusion II follows
- CBoth Conclusion I and Conclusion II follow
- DNeither Conclusion I nor Conclusion II follows
Answer
Only Conclusion I follows.
The correct answer accurately evaluates both conclusions. Conclusion I is a direct logical deduction because a period of two months exceeds the 45-day threshold, triggering the automatic escalation detailed in the first statement. Conclusion II is an extreme, unwarranted generalization because the text offers no comparative data about other departments.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Statement and Conclusions or Inferences