Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardResource Allocation and Priority Ranking

As the District Magistrate coordinating emergency relief during a severe cyclone, you have exactly three specialized National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) teams available for immediate deployment. Four distinct locations across your district have requested urgent intervention:

1. Location W: A tribal hill settlement of 50 residents facing imminent landslide risk within 2 hours, with road connectivity completely severed.
2. Location X: The District Sub-Divisional Hospital caring for 150 critical patients, running on backup generators with fuel remaining for 4 hours.
3. Location Y: A coastal fishing village with 500 residents stranded in a cyclone shelter facing rising storm surges expected to breach defenses in 6 hours.
4. Location Z: An industrial chemical facility reporting a minor non-critical gas valve leak, currently monitored and contained by on-site technical engineers.

Which of the following deployment strategies represents the most administrative and ethically sound priority allocation of the available emergency response teams?

  1. Deploy Team 1 to Location W, Team 2 to Location X, and Team 3 to Location Y, while directing local police and facility technical staff to manage Location Z.Answer
  2. B
    Deploy Team 1 and Team 2 to Location Z to execute an immediate complete lockdown of the industrial plant, and send Team 3 to Location Y.
  3. C
    Deploy Team 1 and Team 2 to Location Y due to the highest stranded population count (500 residents), send Team 3 to Location X, and leave Location W for later response.
  4. D
    Split the three NDRF teams into four smaller makeshift squads to simultaneously cover Locations W, X, Y, and Z.

Answer

Deploy Team 1 to Location W, Team 2 to Location X, and Team 3 to Location Y, while directing local police and facility technical staff to manage Location Z.
The deployment strategy sending Team 1 to Location W, Team 2 to Location X, and Team 3 to Location Y is correct because it ranks intervention priorities objectively by threat window urgency (2 hours vs. 4 hours vs. 6 hours) and severity of vulnerability. Location Z has existing technical oversight and does not currently present an active threat to life, allowing local administration to oversee it effectively.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Evaluate time criticality and severity of threat for each location
Location W has an imminent landslide threat within 2 hours (highest urgency); Location X has critical care fuel depletion within 4 hours; Location Y has storm surge threat within 6 hours; Location Z is already monitored and contained by on-site engineers.
Administrative resource allocation must prioritize objective metrics of urgency and risk to human life.
2
Match available resources (3 teams) to the highest-priority urgent needs
Deploy the 3 available teams to Locations W, X, and Y respectively.
Locations W, X, and Y represent uncontained, time-bound life-safety threats that require specialized NDRF capabilities.
3
Delegate lower-priority or self-contained scenarios to local administrative mechanisms
Assign local law enforcement and facility technical personnel to oversee Location Z.
Optimizes district resource management without diverting elite emergency units from critical rescue missions.

Key Concept

Resource Allocation and Priority Ranking in Administrative Crisis Management
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Resource Allocation and Priority Ranking

More questions from this topic