Read the passage given below:
To check forest degradation and incentivize biodiversity conservation, several state governments have introduced community-managed forestry frameworks that grant rural indigenous cooperatives legal rights to sell voluntary carbon offset credits generated from avoided deforestation. Proponents assert that by linking rural livelihoods directly to global carbon market revenues, these communities will naturally abandon unsustainable timber extraction in favor of long-term conservation. However, carbon markets operate on fluctuating international demand and complex certification protocols that require high technical expertise to measure carbon sequestered. In rural districts with low administrative capacity and fluctuating credit prices, community cooperatives often incur substantial transaction costs to external intermediaries, eroding their net earnings. Consequently, when global carbon credit prices plummet, cooperatives face immediate revenue shortfalls, compelling local households to resume opportunistic tree-felling to satisfy immediate subsistence needs. Therefore, relying exclusively on market-based carbon offsets without providing baseline fiscal guarantees fails to achieve durable forest conservation.
Evaluating the underlying premises of the text above, consider the following assertion:
The author's argument that market-based carbon offsets alone cannot achieve durable forest conservation necessarily assumes that the decision of local households to engage in or abstain from tree-felling is primarily governed by immediate income stability rather than non-monetary ecological commitment.
Answer: Answer