Read the following passage carefully:
Under the 2026 Municipal Public Procurement and Algorithmic Governance Framework, municipal departments deploying automated decision-making systems for public welfare distribution are mandatorily required to undergo third-party algorithmic impact audits. However, the framework stipulates an explicit exemption: automated systems that operate solely as administrative pre-screening mechanisms without final decision-making authority, or those utilizing static, rule-based decision trees with deterministic logic, are exempt from mandatory third-party audits provided they maintain an internal operational log for a minimum of two years. Furthermore, if a pre-screening automated system is flagged for demographic bias during routine internal audits, it automatically loses its exemption and must submit to immediate external evaluation, regardless of whether its recommendations were overridden by human officials. Last year, the Department of Urban Housing deployed an automated sorting system for emergency housing assistance that generated prioritized candidate lists; human case officers then reviewed these lists and issued all final approval decisions.
Based strictly on the information provided in the passage, which of the following statements must logically be true regarding the Department of Urban Housing's automated sorting system?
- The system meets the criteria for pre-screening status, but maintaining its exemption from mandatory third-party audits requires keeping internal operational logs for at least two years and remaining unflagged for demographic bias.Answer
- BThe system is unconditionally exempt from all third-party algorithmic impact audits because human case officers held final decision-making authority.
- CThe system relies on static, rule-based decision trees with deterministic logic rather than adaptive machine-learning models.
- DHuman case officer review guarantees that demographic bias in the candidate list will not necessitate an external audit evaluation.