Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

To combat severe summer water scarcity and mitigate seasonal saltwater intrusion into coastal aquifers, several metropolitan planning authorities have mandated the construction of localized rooftop rainwater harvesting systems paired with neighborhood micro-reservoirs across all high-density commercial developments. City planners contend that capturing urban runoff before it reaches sea-bound storm channels will effectively recharge depleted sub-surface aquifers, thereby securing a continuous non-potable water supply for civic utilities during drought cycles. However, urban hydrologists emphasize that untreated runoff from commercial roofs carries heavy particulate pollutants that can permanently foul sub-surface storage layers. Consequently, municipal regulations now dictate that all such installations must incorporate automated first-flush diverters and bio-filtration assemblies to isolate initial runoff.

Based on the passage above, which of the following is a crucial assumption required for the author's argument regarding the effectiveness of the decentralized rainwater harvesting initiative to hold?

  1. The volume of seasonal rainfall captured after initial runoff diversion is adequate to make a meaningful contribution to aquifer recharge and civic water supply.Answer
  2. B
    Automated first-flush diverters isolate a higher proportion of chemical pollutants than secondary bio-filtration assemblies.
  3. C
    Coastal metropolitan regions lack the financial capacity to build centralized desalination plants as an alternative water source.
  4. D
    Commercial real estate developers will actively resist installing bio-filtration assemblies unless severe criminal penalties are instituted.

Answer

The argument assumes that the volume of seasonal rainfall captured after initial runoff diversion is adequate to make a meaningful contribution to aquifer recharge and civic water supply.
The correct answer identifies a necessary unstated premise. The author argues that mandatory rooftop rainwater harvesting with first-flush diverters will recharge aquifers and provide drought water supplies. For this plan to succeed, the usable water remaining after initial dirty runoff is diverted must be sufficient in quantity to achieve meaningful recharge. If we negate this statement—assuming post-diversion water volume is negligible—the policy goal cannot be achieved, proving this assumption is indispensable to the author's conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's main conclusion and supporting premises.
Conclusion: Mandating rooftop harvesting with micro-reservoirs, first-flush diverters, and bio-filtration will recharge aquifers and ensure non-potable water supply during droughts without polluting sub-surface layers.
Understanding the core argument structure is essential to pinpoint unstated dependencies.
2
Apply the Negation Test to candidate assumptions.
Negating the statement yields: 'The volume of rainfall captured after initial runoff diversion is NOT adequate to make a meaningful contribution to aquifer recharge or water supply.'
If the negated statement is true, the initiative fails to achieve its core goal of aquifer recharge, collapsing the entire rationale.
3
Evaluate distractors for common reasoning fallacies.
Distractors focus on external facts (desalination), unnecessary technical comparisons (diverters vs bio-filtration), or extreme behavioral assumptions (developer hostility).
A valid assumption must be strictly necessary for the argument's logic, not merely plausible or external real-world knowledge.

Key Concept

Identifying implicit premises using the Negation Test in Critical Reasoning
Rate this question

Topics

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

More questions from this topic