In public administration, handling a subordinate's grievance requires following a structured procedural workflow to ensure due process and workplace harmony. Arrange the following administrative steps in the correct chronological sequence from first to last:
- 1Formally receiving and logging the written grievance submission from the subordinate.
- 2Conducting a preliminary fact-finding inquiry and gathering clarifications from the involved parties.
- 3Issuing a reasoned administrative decision detailing proportional corrective actions and guidelines.
- 4Conducting a periodic post-resolution review to verify compliance and assess team climate.
Answer
The correct sequence starts with formally logging the grievance, followed by conducting a preliminary fact-finding inquiry, issuing a reasoned administrative decision, and concluding with a periodic post-resolution review.
Standard administrative governance dictates a linear progression of grievance redressal: formal documentation must precede investigative fact-finding, which then informs a reasoned decision, and the process closes with monitoring compliance and workplace climate.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Chronological Workflow of Administrative Grievance Redressal