An assistant field officer in a regional agricultural division submits a detailed written complaint alleging continuous unfair treatment and deliberate exclusion from critical operational briefings by their direct supervisor. According to standard administrative protocols for formal workplace grievance redressal, arrange the following procedural actions in the correct chronological sequence from initiation to final resolution.
- 1Formal registration of the written complaint and issuance of an official acknowledgment receipt to the complainant.
- 2Execution of a preliminary fact-finding assessment to establish whether a prima facie case of unfair treatment exists.
- 3Constitution of an impartial departmental inquiry committee to formally review evidence and record statements from both the complainant and the supervisor.
- 4Review of the inquiry committee's conclusive report and recommendations by the competent disciplinary authority.
- 5Execution of binding corrective directives and formal communication of the final resolution to the complainant.
Answer
The correct sequence begins with the formal registration of the complaint, followed by a preliminary fact-finding assessment to establish a prima facie case. If merit is found, an impartial inquiry committee is constituted to hear both sides. The committee's report is then reviewed by the competent authority, culminating in the execution of corrective directives and closure of the case.
The correct chronological order ensures strict adherence to natural justice and procedural fairness. It prevents premature escalation by requiring preliminary fact-finding, guarantees unbiased investigation through an impartial committee, separates the investigative body from the final decision-making authority, and ends with actionable closure.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Chronological workflow of formal workplace grievance redressal and due process.
Estimated Time:2m 0s