Read the following passage carefully:
While intellectual property rights (IPR) in agricultural biotechnology aim to incentivize private investment by granting patent monopolies on genetically modified seeds, this legal framework often restricts traditional seed-saving practices of smallholder farmers in developing nations. To mitigate the resultant dependency on multinational corporations, several agrarian coalitions have championed Open Source Seed (OSS) licenses. Under an OSS license, seed breeders pledge newly developed plant varieties to the public domain while binding all derivative breeding lines to the same open access terms through copyleft provisions. Consequently, any commercial seed developer utilizing an OSS-licensed genetic strain is legally barred from claiming proprietary patent protection over subsequent modifications. Proponents argue that this model preserves seed sovereignty and fosters decentralized innovation. However, critics point out that because copyleft encumbrances disincentivize venture capital entry into high-risk breeding research, OSS initiatives must rely almost exclusively on public research grants and non-profit funding to sustain long-term genetic improvement programs.
Based on the passage above, evaluate the truth value of the following statement:
Statement: Under the Open Source Seed framework, commercial seed developers are legally prohibited from obtaining proprietary patent rights over new seed strains if those strains are derived from an OSS-licensed genetic foundation.
Answer: Answer