Regarding the constitutional authority of the Governor and executive-legislative dynamics in an Indian State, which of the following statements are constitutionally correct?
- The decision of the Governor as to whether a specific matter falls within his constitutional discretion is final, and the validity of anything done by him cannot be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion.Answer
- BThe Governor possesses the constitutional power under Article 161 to grant a complete pardon to a convict sentenced to death under state penal laws.
- The Council of Ministers holds office during the pleasure of the Governor, but the Governor cannot arbitrarily dismiss the Cabinet so long as it commands a majority in the Legislative Assembly.Answer
- DWhen a Money Bill passed by the State Legislative Assembly is presented to the Governor under Article 200, the Governor may return the bill to the Assembly with a request for its reconsideration.
Answer
The constitutionally correct statements are the provision conferring finality to the Governor's discretionary decision-making under Article 163(2) and the provision establishing that the Council of Ministers holds office during pleasure subject to maintaining legislative majority support under Article 164(1).
The statements asserting the finality of the Governor's discretionary decision under Article 163(2) and the requirement of maintaining assembly confidence during the Governor's pleasure under Article 164(1) accurately reflect Indian constitutional provisions and established conventions.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Discretionary and legislative powers of the State Governor under Articles 161, 163, 164, and 200