Examkin

Question

Difficulty: EasyInference and Logical Deduction

Read the following passage carefully:

In 2026, the State Ministry of Power introduced the Decentralized Solar Microgrid Initiative to enhance rural electrification across drought-prone districts. Under this regulatory framework, private microgrid operators who install solar power systems in villages with fewer than two thousand households are eligible for a forty percent capital subsidy, provided they maintain an uninterrupted power supply for at least eighteen hours daily. Furthermore, the framework mandates that microgrid operators must sell surplus electricity back to the state distribution grid at a fixed feed-in tariff. However, if an operator fails to meet the minimum eighteen-hour daily supply threshold for three consecutive months, their capital subsidy is revoked, and they are prohibited from participating in state energy tenders for two years. Recent performance evaluations show that several operators struggled during monsoon months due to reduced solar irradiance, leading to temporary supply drops.

Which of the following statements can be logically inferred from the passage provided? Select all correct inferences.

  1. A microgrid operator serving a village of fifteen hundred households that maintains eighteen hours of daily power supply is eligible for the capital subsidy.Answer
  2. An operator whose daily power supply falls below eighteen hours for three consecutive months loses eligibility for state energy tenders for two years.Answer
  3. C
    Monsoon weather patterns cause all private microgrid operators in drought-prone districts to permanently lose their capital subsidies.
  4. D
    The State Ministry of Power should increase feed-in tariff rates during monsoon months to offset reduced solar irradiance.

Answer

The logically valid inferences are that a microgrid operator in a village of 1,500 households maintaining 18 hours of daily supply meets the subsidy criteria, and that an operator failing the 18-hour threshold for three consecutive months faces a two-year ban from state energy tenders.
The valid inferences strictly follow from the text facts: serving 1,500 households (less than 2,000) with 18 hours of power satisfies the subsidy rule, while failing the 18-hour supply threshold for three consecutive months leads directly to the specified two-year tender prohibition.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the conditions for subsidy eligibility given in the passage.
Eligibility requires serving a village with under 2,000 households and maintaining at least 18 hours of daily power.
1,500 households is less than 2,000, and 18 hours satisfies the daily power threshold, making the claim logically valid.
2
Evaluate the penalty conditions for failing the supply threshold.
Failing the 18-hour daily requirement for 3 consecutive months triggers a subsidy revocation and a 2-year tender prohibition.
This directly matches the explicit policy consequence stated in the text.
3
Evaluate distractors for extreme claims or external additions.
Claims asserting that all operators lose subsidies permanently overgeneralize 'several operators struggled', and policy recommendations bring in unsupported external assertions.
Reading comprehension inferences must strictly rely on logical necessity from given premises.

Key Concept

Inference and Logical Deduction
Rate this question

Topics

Inference and Logical Deduction

More questions from this topic