Consider the provided statements and the given conclusions.
Statements:
1. Sunscreens with a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) rating of 30 or higher provide adequate protection against harmful UV rays.
2. The brand 'SunShield' exclusively manufactures sunscreens with an SPF rating of 50.
Conclusions:
I. Sunscreens manufactured by 'SunShield' provide adequate protection against harmful UV rays.
II. Sunscreens with an SPF rating below 30 offer absolutely zero protection against UV rays.
Which of the conclusions logically follows from the statements?
- Only conclusion I followsAnswer
- BOnly conclusion II follows
- CBoth conclusion I and conclusion II follow
- DNeither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
Answer
Only conclusion I follows.
The first conclusion is a direct deduction because SPF 50 mathematically satisfies the '30 or higher' condition stated in the first premise. The second conclusion makes an unwarranted deductive leap by assuming that failing to meet the 'adequate' threshold equates to offering 'absolutely zero' protection, which is entirely unstated in the passage.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Statement and Conclusions or Inferences