Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardEmotional Intelligence and Empathy

A District Social Welfare Officer (DSWO) is tasked with leading a merged administrative unit comprising staff from two previously distinct welfare departments. Following the merger, joint meetings are frequently derailed by hostility, emotional outbursts, and persistent passive resistance among frontline officers. The DSWO recognizes that this friction stems primarily from deep-seated anxieties regarding potential role redundancy and loss of departmental seniority. Applying the principles of Emotional Intelligence (EI), which of the following actions represents the most effective administrative approach to restore organizational cohesion and address the staff's emotional state?

  1. A
    Immediately issue a formal administrative memorandum warning that emotional outbursts during official meetings constitute professional misconduct and will result in adverse entries in annual performance appraisals.
  2. B
    Confront the most vocal dissenters forcefully during the next general staff meeting to reassert administrative control, demonstrate decisive leadership, and outline non-negotiable performance expectations.
  3. C
    Attribute the ongoing friction entirely to poor room acoustics and overcrowding during meetings, and relocate the two groups into separate wings of the office complex to eliminate interaction.
  4. Conduct structured active listening sessions and small-group dialogues to validate staff anxieties, followed by collaboratively establishing transparent role definitions and complementary responsibilities.Answer

Answer

The most effective administrative action is to conduct structured active listening sessions to validate staff anxieties, followed by collaboratively establishing transparent role definitions.
The action focused on structured active listening and collaborative role definition demonstrates high Emotional Intelligence across Goleman's core domains: empathy (recognizing and validating subordinate anxiety), self-regulation (refraining from reactive punishment), and relationship management (building consensus and psychological safety). By addressing the root emotional fear of redundancy while introducing administrative transparency, the administrator resolves both the interpersonal friction and the operational challenge.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Diagnose the underlying emotional state of the organization.
Identify that hostility and passive resistance are symptoms of emotional distress, specifically fear of redundancy and loss of status.
Effective emotional intelligence requires social awareness (empathy) to perceive the psychological drivers behind workplace behavior.
2
Select an empathetic intervention over authoritarian or passive responses.
Engage in active listening and open dialogue to validate the staff's concerns rather than resorting to punitive measures or superficial environmental changes.
Empathy validates emotional experiences, reduces defensive posture, and creates psychological safety within integrated teams.
3
Apply relationship management strategies to solve the operational dilemma.
Collaboratively define transparent role boundaries and complementary responsibilities.
Combining empathy with structured organizational clarity addresses both the emotional trigger (anxiety) and the systemic issue (role ambiguity).

Key Concept

Emotional Intelligence and Empathy in Civil Service Leadership
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Emotional Intelligence and Empathy

More questions from this topic