Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardCause and Effect Reasoning

Consider the three observed developments (Statements I, II, and III) in an urban industrial hub:

Statement I: The municipal authority enforced strict rainwater harvesting mandates and levied severe penalties on illegal groundwater extraction across all commercial facilities.
Statement II: Hydrogeological surveys recorded a significant rise of 3.5 meters in the average depth of the regional groundwater table across the commercial district over a two-year period.
Statement III: Private water tanker operators in the district reported a 45% decline in commercial supply orders during the same two-year period.

Which of the following statements regarding the logical cause-and-effect relationships among Statements I, II, and III are correct?

  1. Statement I serves as the primary direct cause, while Statement II functions as its direct physical outcome.Answer
  2. B
    Statement II is an independent cause, whereas Statements I and III are its parallel effects.
  3. Statement I acts as the primary administrative cause, while Statement III represents an indirect economic effect stemming from reduced commercial reliance on private water.Answer
  4. D
    Statement III is the main cause that logically preceded and necessitated the municipal policy described in Statement I.

Answer

The statements identifying Statement I as the primary cause driving both the environmental recovery (Statement II) and the economic demand drop (Statement III) are correct.
The administrative policy restricting illegal groundwater extraction and enforcing rainwater harvesting (Statement I) logically precedes and directly accounts for both the physical replenishment of groundwater (Statement II) and the reduced reliance on commercial private tankers (Statement III). Therefore, both the direct physical effect statement and the indirect economic effect statement accurately describe the causal sequence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Statement I as an intervention.
Statement I represents a deliberate regulatory policy intervention (rainwater harvesting mandates + extraction penalties).
Administrative enforcement logically precedes measurable ecological and economic changes in the sector.
2
Evaluate the relation between Statement I and Statement II.
Restricting extraction and boosting recharge directly increases the water table depth.
This establishes a direct physical cause-and-effect link from Statement I to Statement II.
3
Evaluate the relation between Statement I and Statement III.
Increased internal water storage and restricted extraction lower reliance on external tanker purchasing.
This establishes an indirect economic cause-and-effect link from Statement I to Statement III.

Key Concept

Multi-Statement Causal Relationships and Derivative Effects
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Cause and Effect Reasoning

More questions from this topic