Question

Difficulty: HardPassage Assumptions and Underlying Premises

Read the following passage carefully:

To mitigate urban micronutrient malnutrition while addressing regional groundwater depletion, several state governments have proposed incorporating drought-resistant millets into urban public distribution systems through guaranteed municipal procurement. Proponents argue that establishing stable public demand will raise farm-gate prices for coarse cereals, thereby incentivizing smallholder farmers in rain-fed zones to transition away from water-intensive paddy and wheat monocultures. They further maintain that this shift will enhance regional ecological resilience without escalating net state welfare expenditure. However, agrarian policy analysts note that raw millets require specialized primary processing to become shelf-stable and marketable. Without state-subsidized localized processing infrastructure, high post-harvest processing costs and transport losses will absorb the price premium offered by public procurement, ultimately preventing farmers from sustaining millet production.

Based on the passage above, evaluate whether the following statement functions as a necessary underlying assumption of the proponents' policy argument:

Statement: The claim that guaranteed public procurement will induce smallholder farmers to shift away from water-intensive monocultures assumes that the financial returns from higher farm-gate prices will not be entirely offset by post-harvest processing and transport costs.

Answer: Answer

Answer

The statement is TRUE because the proponents' argument relies on price premiums providing a net financial incentive for farmers to change their cropping behavior.
The correct evaluation is TRUE. The proponents' central claim relies on higher farm-gate prices providing a sufficient incentive for farmers to alter their agricultural practices. If post-harvest processing expenses neutralize those higher prices, the incentive disappears and the proposed transition fails. Thus, the argument implicitly assumes that processing costs will not entirely consume the financial gains.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core conclusion and proposed mechanism
Conclusion: Guaranteed public procurement will incentivize smallholder farmers to shift from water-intensive crops to millets. Mechanism: Guaranteed procurement raises farm-gate prices, creating an economic incentive.
Understanding the causal link between the policy intervention and farmer behavior is essential before evaluating implicit assumptions.
2
Apply the Negation Test to the statement
Negate the statement: 'Financial returns from higher farm-gate prices WILL be entirely offset by post-harvest processing and transport costs.'
If negating an unstated premise causes the author's main argument to collapse, that premise is a required assumption.
3
Evaluate the impact of the negated statement on the argument
If all price gains are absorbed by processing costs, farmers gain zero net profit increase, removing the financial motivation to abandon paddy and wheat monocultures. The policy mechanism fails.
Since the argument collapses under negation, the statement represents an indispensable underlying premise of the proponents' position.

Key Concept

Passage Assumptions and Underlying Premises
Rate this question