Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardPublic Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

A state department of food and public distribution plans to transition its rural Public Distribution System (PDS) to a fully digitized Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) scheme to curb grain leakage. However, an administrative feasibility report highlights three major constraints: 45% of targeted rural pockets lack stable telecom connectivity, over 30% of elderly beneficiaries face biometric authentication failures, and local fair-price shop operators express strong resistance due to technical illiteracy. If the state proceeds without addressing these bottlenecks, severe exclusion of genuinely eligible households is anticipated. Which of the following implementation strategies provides the most administratively feasible and high-impact policy approach?

  1. A
    Immediately mandate 100% online biometric authentication across all districts and suspend grain allocations to non-compliant shops to enforce strict system adherence.
  2. Implement a phased hybrid rollout that allows offline-capable device verification and non-biometric proxy overrides backed by social audits, while concurrently upgrading telecom infrastructure in weak connectivity pockets.Answer
  3. C
    Indefinitely defer the digital transformation policy and revert entirely to unmonitored manual paper registers across all rural districts.
  4. D
    Assume market forces will compel beneficiaries to purchase personal smartphones for self-verification within six months, delaying food grain distribution until universal smartphone ownership is recorded.

Answer

The strategy to implement a phased hybrid rollout allowing offline-capable verification and non-biometric proxy overrides backed by social audits, while progressively addressing telecom connectivity, represents the most feasible and balanced administrative approach.
The option advocating a phased hybrid rollout with offline-capable devices, non-biometric proxy overrides, and social audits directly mitigates the identified bottlenecks (telecom dead zones, biometric failure among the elderly, operator resistance) while preserving the core objectives of leakage reduction and administrative accountability.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the policy objective and administrative constraints
Identified the goal (curbing grain leakage through digitization) and bottlenecks (connectivity gaps, biometric failures among elderly, operator resistance).
Public policy feasibility evaluation requires weighing intended benefits against operational constraints and social risks.
2
Evaluate policy options against the criteria of feasibility, impact, and exclusion risk
Determined that rigid enforcement causes mass exclusion, while total abandonment fails the reform mandate. A hybrid, phased approach addresses both efficiency and equity.
Administrative decisions in welfare delivery must ensure equity and administrative feasibility alongside technological efficacy.
3
Formulate the optimal administrative decision
Selected the phased rollout with offline capabilities and fallback mechanisms.
This maintains policy momentum without compromising welfare access for vulnerable populations.

Key Concept

Public Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis
Rate this question

Topics

Public Policy Feasibility and Impact Analysis

More questions from this topic