Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardAdvance Directives and End-of-Life Care

A 72-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic cancer is hospitalized for intractable abdominal pain and worsening hypoxic respiratory failure. She is currently somnolent, arousable only to noxious stimuli, and entirely lacks decision-making capacity. Her medical record contains a legally valid advance directive naming her long-term domestic partner as her sole healthcare proxy. The partner requests that the medical team aggressively titrate intravenous morphine to alleviate the patient's severe pain, explicitly acknowledging that this may depress her respiratory drive and potentially hasten her death. Shortly after, the patient's estranged adult daughter arrives at the bedside and demands that no further opioids be given. The daughter argues that administering high doses of morphine constitutes active euthanasia and threatens legal action if the opioids are continued. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

  1. Titrate intravenous morphine to achieve adequate pain control.Answer
  2. B
    Withhold further opioid administration to avoid respiratory depression.
  3. C
    Delay opioid titration until the hospital ethics committee reviews the case.
  4. D
    Follow the daughter's directive as the highest-ranking biological relative.
  5. E
    Provide only non-opioid analgesics to achieve a compromise between the parties.

Answer

Titrate intravenous morphine to achieve adequate pain control.
The correct answer identifies that the physician should follow the proxy's request to provide adequate analgesia. The patient lacks decision-making capacity, meaning her legally designated healthcare proxy (the domestic partner) holds the authority to make medical decisions on her behalf. The proxy's decision aligns with standard palliative care practices. The ethical principle of double effect justifies the administration of medication to relieve severe pain, even if it has the unintended but foreseeable consequence of hastening death (e.g., via respiratory depression). Therefore, the physician should follow the proxy's directive and provide adequate analgesia without unnecessary delay or compromise.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine decision-making capacity.
The patient is somnolent and entirely lacks capacity.
A patient must lack capacity before a surrogate decision-maker can be utilized.
2
Identify the legal surrogate decision-maker.
The domestic partner is the legally designated healthcare proxy.
A formally designated healthcare proxy supersedes all biological relatives in the surrogate hierarchy.
3
Evaluate the medical appropriateness of the proxy's request.
The request for opioid titration is medically appropriate for palliative care.
Under the ethical principle of double effect, administering opioids for severe pain relief is acceptable even if it foreseeably hastens death, as the primary intent is to relieve suffering.

Key Concept

The principle of double effect justifies aggressive pain management at the end of life, and a legally designated healthcare proxy has overriding decision-making authority compared to biological relatives.
Rate this question

Topics

Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care

More questions from this topic