Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardConfidentiality and Privacy

A 38-year-old man comes to the clinic for a follow-up regarding his major depressive disorder. During the interview, he appears highly agitated. He discloses that he has been feeling increasingly overwhelmed at home and admits to physically abusing his 7-year-old daughter, stating, "I lost my temper and beat her with a wooden spoon last night; she has dark bruises all over her back." Later in the same visit, the patient expresses intense rage toward a specific former business partner, saying, "I am going to drive to his office and shoot him this afternoon." He confirms he has a loaded handgun in his vehicle. The patient demands that the physician keep all of this information strictly confidential. Which of the following are the most appropriate responses? (Select all that apply)

  1. Notify the state child protective services agencyAnswer
  2. Notify the identified former business partnerAnswer
  3. Notify local law enforcement authoritiesAnswer
  4. D
    Notify the patient's spouse about the threats and abuse
  5. E
    Notify the patient's current employer to arrange mental health leave

Answer

The most appropriate responses are to notify the state child protective services agency, the identified former business partner, and local law enforcement authorities.
Patient confidentiality is a foundational principle of medical ethics, but it is not absolute. There are specific circumstances where physicians are legally and ethically obligated to breach confidentiality. First, all states require physicians to report suspected child abuse to child protective services immediately; this supersedes the patient's request for privacy. Second, under the duty to protect (often referred to as the Tarasoff exception), when a patient presents a serious, imminent threat of violence to a reasonably identifiable third party, the physician must take steps to protect that individual. This typically involves notifying the intended victim (the former business partner) and contacting local law enforcement authorities. Therefore, notifying child protective services, the intended victim, and the police are all appropriate and justified responses to prevent severe harm.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the ethical conflict in the clinical vignette.
The patient demands confidentiality after disclosing ongoing child physical abuse and a specific, imminent plan to murder an identifiable third party.
Recognizing the conflict between the duty of confidentiality and the duty to protect vulnerable individuals from harm.
2
Evaluate the disclosure of child abuse against legal and ethical guidelines.
Suspected child abuse triggers mandatory reporting laws in all jurisdictions, requiring the physician to notify child protective services.
Mandatory reporting supersedes patient confidentiality to protect minors from ongoing harm.
3
Evaluate the threat of homicide against the duty to protect.
The patient made a credible, imminent threat of severe violence against a specifically named individual and possesses the means (a handgun) to carry it out.
This meets the threshold for the duty to protect (Tarasoff), which legally and ethically justifies breaching confidentiality.
4
Determine the appropriate parties to notify to prevent the homicide.
The physician should notify the intended victim (the business partner) and local law enforcement authorities.
Informing both the victim and the police are standard, justified actions to fulfill the duty to protect and mitigate the immediate danger.

Key Concept

Exceptions to confidentiality include mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse and the duty to protect an identifiable third party from an imminent, credible threat of severe harm.
Rate this question

Topics

Confidentiality and Privacy

More questions from this topic