Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumInformed Consent and Refusal of Care

A 76-year-old man is brought to the emergency department from an assisted living facility due to severe, generalized abdominal pain and altered mental status. On arrival, he is lethargic and oriented only to his name. His temperature is 39.1°C (102.4°F), blood pressure is 74/46 mm Hg, pulse is 128/min, and respirations are 26/min. Physical examination shows a rigid, board-like abdomen with severe rebound tenderness. An upright chest x-ray reveals free air under the right hemidiaphragm. The general surgery team is consulted and recommends an immediate exploratory laparotomy. The patient is unable to understand the risks and benefits of the procedure and lacks decision-making capacity. The facility's records indicate that the patient's eldest daughter is his legally appointed healthcare proxy. The daughter is currently on a remote wilderness excursion and is completely unreachable by satellite or cellular phone. The patient's younger son, who is present in the emergency department, demands that the surgical team wait until his sister can be contacted, stating, 'She is the only one with the legal authority to approve this surgery.' Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?

  1. Proceed immediately with the exploratory laparotomyAnswer
  2. B
    Obtain written informed consent from the younger son to proceed with the surgery
  3. C
    Delay the surgical intervention until the eldest daughter can be successfully contacted
  4. D
    Request an emergency court injunction to override the need for the proxy's consent
  5. E
    Provide supportive care with intravenous fluids and antibiotics until the patient regains decision-making capacity

Answer

Proceed immediately with the exploratory laparotomy.
The correct answer is to proceed immediately with the life-saving surgery. Informed consent is required before any medical procedure; however, there is an exception for emergency situations. The doctrine of implied consent applies when a patient is experiencing a life- or limb-threatening emergency, lacks decision-making capacity, and a surrogate decision-maker is not immediately available. In this scenario, the patient is in septic shock from a perforated viscus, which will be fatal without immediate surgery. Because his designated healthcare proxy is unreachable, the physicians are legally and ethically obligated to proceed with the laparotomy without waiting for consent.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Determine the urgency of the patient's clinical condition.
The patient has a perforated viscus with septic shock, which is an immediate life-threatening emergency requiring urgent surgical intervention.
Establishing the clinical acuity is the first step in deciding whether standard informed consent rules or emergency exceptions apply.
2
Assess the patient's decision-making capacity.
The patient is lethargic, confused, and unable to comprehend the situation, meaning he lacks the capacity to provide informed consent.
Only patients with capacity can give or refuse consent. If capacity is absent, a surrogate or legal exception is required.
3
Evaluate the availability of the legally appointed surrogate.
The healthcare proxy (the daughter) is completely unreachable, and the delay required to contact her would likely result in the patient's death.
If a proxy is unavailable during a life-threatening emergency, the doctrine of implied consent applies, allowing physicians to proceed with life-saving care without explicit consent.

Key Concept

Under the doctrine of implied consent, physicians should immediately provide life-saving treatment to an incapacitated patient in an emergency situation when their legal surrogate is unreachable.
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

Informed Consent and Refusal of Care

More questions from this topic