Pulmonologists at a tertiary care center are analyzing data from a recent multi-center clinical trial. The trial investigated whether adding a novel interleukin-5 inhibitor to standard therapy improves lung function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. The investigators measured the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second () from baseline to week 24. Results demonstrate that patients receiving the novel biologic had a mean improvement that was greater than those receiving standard therapy alone. The 95% confidence interval for this mean difference spans from to . Which of the following is the most appropriate statistical interpretation of these data?
- The p-value for the mean difference is less than 0.05.Answer
- BConstructing a 99% confidence interval from these data would yield a narrower range than the reported interval.
- CThe trial lacks sufficient statistical power, indicating a high probability of a Type II error.
- DThere is a 95% probability that the true population mean difference is exactly 150 mL.
- EThe null hypothesis was successfully rejected specifically because the confidence interval does not include 1.0.
Answer
The p-value for the mean difference is less than 0.05.
The study reports a 95% confidence interval for a mean difference that ranges from to . For a difference in continuous means, the null hypothesis posits that there is no difference between the groups, meaning the null value is 0. Because the entire 95% confidence interval excludes 0, we can reject the null hypothesis at the significance level. This mathematically guarantees that the corresponding p-value for this finding is less than 0.05.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
The relationship between confidence intervals and p-values: a 95% confidence interval that excludes the null value corresponds to a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05.