Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardProfessionalism and Workplace Ethics

A 62-year-old man is admitted to the hospital at night with a small bowel obstruction. He has a fever, tachycardia, and localized abdominal guarding. The night-float resident decides to manage the patient conservatively with nasogastric decompression and intravenous fluids. The next morning, the day-shift resident assumes care, recognizes the signs of bowel ischemia, and immediately alerts the attending surgeon. The patient undergoes an emergency laparotomy, which reveals a strangulated bowel loop requiring resection.

Postoperatively, while the patient is intubated in the intensive care unit, the patient's legally appointed healthcare proxy asks the day-shift resident, "Why wasn't the surgery done last night? Could the bowel resection have been avoided?" The night-float resident, who is also present, privately asks the day-shift resident not to mention the delayed diagnosis to protect their career.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step for the day-shift resident?

  1. Discuss the event with the attending surgeon to facilitate a coordinated, truthful disclosure to the healthcare proxy.Answer
  2. B
    Independently inform the proxy immediately about the night-float resident's mistake to ensure complete transparency.
  3. C
    Explain to the proxy that conservative management is always the standard initial approach, minimizing the appearance of a medical error.
  4. D
    Disclose the oversight to the patient's visiting brother instead, as he is a physician and will better understand the clinical nuances.
  5. E
    Discuss the patient's specific case details with a trusted colleague from another hospital to seek unbiased advice on managing the situation.

Answer

The most appropriate action is to discuss the event with the attending surgeon to facilitate a coordinated, truthful disclosure to the healthcare proxy.
The attending physician bears the ultimate ethical and legal responsibility for the patient's care. When a major medical error occurs, especially one involving trainee oversight or a delayed diagnosis, the most appropriate professional action is to involve the attending physician immediately. This ensures that the disclosure to the patient or their proxy is accurate, coordinated, and accompanied by a clear plan for ongoing care and institutional root-cause review.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the ethical and clinical conflict.
A medical error (delayed surgery for a strangulated obstruction) occurred, and a colleague is actively requesting a cover-up.
Recognizing the dual duty to the patient (truthfulness) and the profession (reporting errors) is the first step in ethical problem-solving.
2
Recognize the obligation regarding medical error disclosure.
Physicians have an ethical mandate to truthfully disclose medical errors that cause harm to the patient or their designated proxy.
Covering up an error or providing false reassurance violates the core principles of beneficence and autonomy.
3
Determine the appropriate chain of command for disclosure.
The attending physician must be involved in the disclosure of a major adverse event.
The attending physician holds ultimate legal and ethical responsibility for the patient's care. Unilateral disclosure by a resident is unprofessional and fragments the care team.

Key Concept

Disclosure of Medical Errors and Chain of Command
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Professionalism and Workplace Ethics

More questions from this topic