A palliative care consultation is requested for a 68-year-old man who is hospitalized with a malignant small bowel obstruction secondary to widely metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The patient is currently obtunded, responding only to deep painful stimuli, and lacks decision-making capacity. His medical record contains a legally executed durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOA-HC) designating his longtime domestic partner as his healthcare surrogate. He also has a living will, signed seven years ago, explicitly stating he would not want artificial nutrition, hydration, or surgical interventions if he developed a terminal condition. The domestic partner requests that the medical team focus exclusively on comfort measures and decline both surgical decompression and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Shortly after, the patient's adult son from a previous marriage arrives. He is distraught, argues that the living will is outdated since it was signed years before the cancer diagnosis, and demands that the team immediately initiate TPN and consult surgery. The son threatens to file a lawsuit if his father is not treated aggressively. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AAdminister total parenteral nutrition temporarily until a hospital ethics committee can formally mediate the family dispute
- Honor the domestic partner's request and transition the patient to comfort-focused careAnswer
- CFollow the adult son's demands because he is a first-degree relative and legally supersedes a domestic partner
- DTransfer decision-making authority to the adult son because the living will was executed significantly prior to the current acute diagnosis
- ESeek a court-appointed emergency guardian to make healthcare decisions due to the threat of legal action from a direct family member