Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumMedical Malpractice and Legal Issues

A 45-year-old woman initiates a direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultation with a dermatologist for a changing, pigmented skin lesion on her right shoulder. She uploads a close-up photograph of the lesion using her smartphone. The dermatologist reviews the image, diagnoses a benign seborrheic keratosis, and advises routine observation without recommending a biopsy. Eighteen months later, the lesion ulcerates, and an in-person evaluation reveals a thick nodular melanoma. The patient subsequently requires wide local excision and lymph node dissection. She files a medical malpractice lawsuit against the dermatologist, claiming negligence. To establish a successful prima facie claim of medical negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the delay in diagnosis directly caused a worse prognosis (proximate causation) and that she suffered compensable harm (actual damages). Which TWO of the following additional legal elements MUST the plaintiff also prove to establish negligence?

  1. The dermatologist owed a legal duty of care to the patientAnswer
  2. The dermatologist's actions fell below the accepted standard of careAnswer
  3. C
    The dermatologist acted with malicious intent or reckless disregard
  4. D
    The patient was completely free of any contributory negligence regarding the uploaded photograph's quality
  5. E
    A formal, signed contract for medical services was executed prior to the consultation

Answer

The plaintiff must prove that the dermatologist owed a legal duty of care to the patient and that the dermatologist's actions fell below the accepted standard of care.
To win a medical malpractice lawsuit based on negligence, the plaintiff must prove four distinct elements, often remembered as the '4 Ds': 1) Duty (a physician-patient relationship existed), 2) Dereliction/Breach (the physician failed to meet the accepted standard of care), 3) Direct Causation (the breach directly caused the injury), and 4) Damages (the patient suffered actual harm). Because the stem already mentions causation and damages, the remaining two elements the plaintiff MUST prove are that a legal duty of care existed and that this duty was breached.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the legal claim being made in the clinical vignette.
The patient is filing a medical malpractice claim based on negligence.
Determining the type of legal claim dictates which legal elements are required for a successful lawsuit.
2
Recall the four essential elements of medical negligence.
The four elements (the '4 Ds') are: Duty, Dereliction (Breach of duty), Direct Causation, and Damages.
A plaintiff must prove all four elements by a preponderance of the evidence to win a malpractice suit.
3
Identify which elements are already provided in the stem and which remain.
The stem states that proximate causation and actual damages must be proven. Therefore, the remaining two elements that must also be proven are Duty and Dereliction (Breach of standard of care).
The question specifically asks for the 'additional' elements not already listed in the prompt.

Key Concept

The four required elements to establish a claim of medical malpractice (negligence) are Duty, Breach (Dereliction), Causation, and Damages.
Rate this question

Topics

Medical Malpractice and Legal Issues

More questions from this topic