A 76-year-old man is evaluated in the intensive care unit 5 days after a massive left middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. He is unresponsive, ventilator-dependent, and has absent gag and cough reflexes. Neurology consultation confirms a devastating neurological prognosis with no reasonable hope for meaningful cognitive recovery. The patient has a legally binding advance directive (living will) in his electronic medical record, executed two years ago, which states: 'I do not wish to be kept alive on a mechanical ventilator if I suffer a severe brain injury with no hope of meaningful recovery.' The document also designates his eldest daughter as his legally authorized healthcare proxy.
The physician meets with the daughter to discuss transitioning to comfort care and withdrawing mechanical ventilation. The daughter cries and states, 'I have read his living will, and I know he always said he never wanted to be kept alive like this. But I am his proxy, and I just cannot bear to be the one who lets him die. I want you to keep the breathing machine on.'
Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- Inform the daughter that mechanical ventilation will be withdrawn in accordance with the patient's living willAnswer
- BContinue mechanical ventilation because the designated healthcare proxy has the final legal authority over the patient's care
- CMaintain mechanical ventilation while awaiting a formal ruling from the hospital ethics committee to resolve the conflict
- DTransfer surrogate decision-making authority to the patient's adult son who is willing to authorize extubation
- ESeek an emergency court order to revoke the daughter's status as the legally appointed healthcare proxy