Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardAdvance Directives and End-of-Life Care

A 77-year-old man with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is transported to the emergency department due to acute-on-chronic hypoxemic respiratory failure. Upon arrival, the patient is lethargic, intermittently delirious, and unable to communicate coherently. The attending physician determines he currently lacks decision-making capacity. The patient is exhibiting severe respiratory distress, and the clinical team recommends emergent intubation.

The patient's legally designated healthcare proxy—his long-term domestic partner—is present at the bedside. Shortly after, the patient's adult son arrives and presents a formalized living will signed by the patient four years ago. The document clearly states a refusal of mechanical ventilation in the setting of irreversible lung disease. The son insists the team follow the written document and provide comfort care only. The domestic partner acknowledges the document but reports that three days ago, during a period of lucidity, the patient explicitly stated he wanted "everything done, including a breathing tube," so he could survive long enough to attend his granddaughter's wedding next month. The son objects, arguing that a written, notarized document cannot be legally overridden by unverified oral claims.

Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the management of this patient?

  1. A
    Withhold intubation in strict adherence to the formalized written living will
  2. B
    Follow the son's directive because biological relatives supersede unmarried domestic partners in the surrogate hierarchy
  3. Initiate intubation and respiratory support as authorized by the designated healthcare proxyAnswer
  4. D
    Postpone intubation until the hospital ethics committee can convene to mediate the family dispute
  5. E
    Seek an emergency court injunction to determine the legal validity of the patient's recent oral statements

Answer

Initiate intubation and respiratory support as authorized by the designated healthcare proxy.
The patient lacks decision-making capacity and requires an emergent medical intervention. He has a legally appointed healthcare proxy, who holds the highest priority in the surrogate decision-maker hierarchy. When a patient's prior written advance directive conflicts with more recent oral statements made by the patient, the most recent expression of the patient's wishes generally takes precedence, as a competent patient can revoke or modify an advance directive at any time. It is the role of the designated healthcare proxy to exercise substituted judgment based on these updated wishes. In an emergent situation, providing life-sustaining treatment as requested by the legal proxy is the appropriate course of action; the proxy has the legal authority to report and act on the patient's updated verbal wishes without requiring a court order or ethics consultation that would dangerously delay care.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's decision-making capacity.
The patient is lethargic, delirious, and determined to lack capacity.
Medical decisions for an incapacitated patient must be deferred to an advance directive or a surrogate decision-maker.
2
Identify the primary surrogate decision-maker.
The domestic partner is the legally designated healthcare proxy.
A formally designated healthcare proxy holds the highest position in the surrogate hierarchy, strictly superseding biological next-of-kin.
3
Evaluate the conflict between the prior written living will and recent oral statements.
The recent oral statements provided to the proxy take precedence.
Patients may legally revoke or modify advance directives at any time. The proxy exercises substituted judgment based on the patient's most current known wishes.
4
Determine the clinical management in an emergent setting.
Intubation and respiratory support should be initiated.
The legal proxy has authorized the life-saving intervention based on the patient's recent wishes; delaying emergent care for ethics or legal consultation is clinically inappropriate.

Key Concept

Surrogate Decision-Making and Revocation of Advance Directives
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care

More questions from this topic