Question

Difficulty: HardHuman Factors and Cognitive Biases

An internal medicine physician is participating in a departmental case review in an outpatient clinic. The case involves a 48-year-old woman who presented with chronic fatigue, constipation, and intermittent palpitations. At the beginning of the encounter, the physician noted that the patient's electronic health record prominently displayed a prior diagnosis of major depressive disorder on the summary screen. Upon seeing this, the physician immediately formulated a working diagnosis of inadequately treated depression with somatic symptoms. Despite the patient explicitly describing new-onset bone pain and stating that her mood had actually been stable, the physician did not perform a physical examination or order any laboratory investigations. Instead, the physician increased the dose of her selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and referred her for psychotherapy. Six weeks later, the patient was diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism after presenting to the emergency department with a serum calcium level of 12.112.1 mg/dL. The case review committee concludes that the physician's diagnostic process was derailed because they locked onto the prominent psychiatric history presented at the start of the encounter and failed to appropriately adjust their differential diagnosis when presented with new, incongruent clinical evidence.

Which of the following cognitive biases is most accurately described by the committee's findings?

  1. A
    Availability heuristic
  2. B
    Premature closure
  3. Anchoring biasAnswer
  4. D
    Confirmation bias
  5. E
    Framing effect

Answer

The correct answer is anchoring bias.
The correct answer is anchoring bias. Anchoring bias is a cognitive error in which a decision-maker relies too heavily on the first piece of information offered (the 'anchor') and fails to appropriately adjust their thinking as new, contradicting information is presented. In this clinical scenario, the physician immediately fixated on the prominent electronic health record summary of major depressive disorder at the start of the encounter. Because of this initial anchor, the physician failed to adjust the differential diagnosis when the patient reported new physical symptoms (bone pain, constipation, palpitations) that were incongruent with pure depression, leading to the delayed diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the specific findings of the case review committee described in the clinical vignette.
The committee concluded that the error occurred because the physician locked onto the initial information provided at the start of the encounter (the prior psychiatric diagnosis) and failed to adjust when new, contradictory symptoms were presented.
Identifying the precise cognitive process described is necessary to correctly classify the human factors error.
2
Differentiate between the available cognitive bias options based on the identified process.
Anchoring bias perfectly matches the phenomenon of relying too heavily on an initial 'anchor' and failing to adapt to subsequent clinical data. While premature closure resulted from this error, anchoring was the specific cognitive mechanism described.
The question requires discriminating between closely related, yet distinct, cognitive biases in diagnostic reasoning.

Key Concept

Anchoring bias occurs when a clinician relies too heavily on the first piece of information provided (e.g., a triage note or past medical history) and fails to appropriately adjust their diagnostic thinking when new, contradicting information becomes available.
Rate this question