Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumPhysician Impairment and Peer Reporting

A 32-year-old cardiologist is evaluating a 68-year-old patient in the hospital for preoperative clearance. The patient is scheduled to undergo a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in one hour. The cardiologist meets with the 60-year-old attending cardiothoracic surgeon to discuss the patient's recent echocardiogram results. During their conversation, the cardiologist notices that the surgeon has significantly slurred speech, a prominent resting tremor in both hands, and repeatedly forgets the patient's name and critical anatomical findings. When the cardiologist expresses concern regarding the surgeon's well-being, the surgeon becomes defensive, stating, "I've just been on call for 36 hours and I am exhausted. I will be fine once I get into the operating room." Which of the following is the most appropriate next step for the cardiologist?

  1. A
    Confront the surgeon privately and strongly advise him to voluntarily cancel the operation.
  2. B
    Accept the surgeon's explanation of fatigue and recommend he take a brief rest before operating.
  3. Notify the hospital's chief medical officer or the chief of surgery immediately.Answer
  4. D
    Recommend the surgeon undergo an urgent neurological evaluation and brain imaging prior to the surgery.
  5. E
    Inform the anesthesiologist during patient handoff about the surgeon's condition so they can monitor him.

Answer

Notify the hospital's chief medical officer or the chief of surgery immediately.
The primary ethical duty of any physician is to protect patient safety. When a colleague exhibits clear signs of impairment (e.g., slurred speech, resting tremors, acute memory deficits) and is about to perform a high-risk procedure, immediate intervention is non-negotiable. Because the surgeon is defensive and dismissive of the concerns, a private conversation is insufficient. The most appropriate action is to urgently escalate the concern to the clinical supervisor, such as the chief of surgery or chief medical officer. These individuals have the authority to suspend the physician's clinical privileges immediately, cancel or reassign the procedure, and ensure the impaired physician receives proper evaluation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary ethical dilemma in the clinical scenario.
The attending surgeon is exhibiting clear signs of severe impairment (slurred speech, tremors, memory loss) right before a scheduled high-risk operation.
Recognizing the immediate threat to patient safety is the first and most critical step in addressing physician impairment.
2
Evaluate the severity and immediacy of the risk to the patient.
The patient is scheduled for a CABG in one hour, and the surgeon is defensively refusing to acknowledge his compromised state, constituting an imminent threat.
Immediate threats to patient safety dictate a rapid, escalated response rather than routine or delayed peer reporting pathways.
3
Determine the legally and ethically mandated action.
The cardiologist must bypass informal collegial resolution and immediately notify institutional leadership.
Only institutional authorities (like the Chief of Surgery) have the immediate administrative power to suspend clinical privileges on the spot and ensure the patient is safely reassigned.

Key Concept

When an impaired physician poses an immediate and severe threat to patient safety, colleagues must immediately report the behavior to institutional leadership (e.g., Chief of Staff, Chief Medical Officer) to halt clinical duties.
Rate this question

Topics

Physician Impairment and Peer Reporting

More questions from this topic