A physician is critically appraising a multi-page drug advertisement for a novel oral anticoagulant, rivatran, targeted at patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of recurrent ischemic stroke.
The headline of the advertisement proclaims in large font: *"Rivatran significantly lowers the risk of recurrent stroke, demonstrating a relative risk reduction compared to standard warfarin therapy!"*
Upon reviewing the fine print in the supplemental prescribing information, the physician examines the following safety and efficacy data from the 3-year pivotal trial:
| Outcome at 3 Years | Rivatran () | Warfarin () |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrent ischemic stroke | Not provided | |
| Major bleeding events |
Based on the data provided, how many patients would need to be treated with rivatran instead of warfarin for 3 years to prevent one recurrent stroke?
Answer: 25 patients
Answer
25
To determine the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), the Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) must first be calculated, as . The ARR is the difference between the Control Event Rate (CER) and the Experimental Event Rate (EER). The advertisement provides the Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) as () and the EER for the intervention as (). The relative risk (RR) can be derived from the RRR because , making the . Since , we can determine the omitted baseline risk in the warfarin group: , which yields a CER of (). The ARR is therefore (). Finally, the NNT is . This means 25 patients need to be treated with rivatran instead of warfarin for 3 years to prevent one recurrent ischemic stroke.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Calculating Number Needed to Treat (NNT) by first deriving the baseline risk and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) from a reported Relative Risk Reduction (RRR).