Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumPhysician Impairment and Peer Reporting

A 32-year-old junior oncologist is working in a busy outpatient infusion center. While reviewing orders, the physician notes that a senior partner has just prescribed a chemotherapy dose that is three times the recommended limit for a patient currently waiting in the infusion suite. The junior physician immediately approaches the senior partner to discuss the discrepancy. The senior partner appears disoriented, cannot recall the patient's diagnosis, and asks where the hospital cafeteria is, despite having worked in this clinic for 15 years. Over the past three months, clinic staff have noted the senior partner having increasing memory lapses and deteriorating personal hygiene. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step by the junior physician?

  1. Cancel the erroneous chemotherapy order and notify the clinic's medical director regarding the colleague's suspected cognitive impairmentAnswer
  2. B
    Confront the senior partner privately about the memory lapses and strongly recommend voluntary retirement
  3. C
    Correct the chemotherapy order in the electronic health record and quietly assume care of the partner's remaining patients for the day
  4. D
    File an immediate, direct report with the state medical licensing board before addressing the patient's active orders
  5. E
    Document the incident in the clinic's internal records and monitor the partner for further errors before taking formal action

Answer

Cancel the erroneous chemotherapy order and notify the clinic's medical director regarding the colleague's suspected cognitive impairment
Physicians have a strict ethical and legal obligation to report colleagues who are impaired due to substance use, psychiatric illness, or cognitive decline. When a physician encounters an impaired colleague, the absolute first priority is to protect patient safety. In this scenario, a potentially lethal chemotherapy dose has been ordered and the patient is actively waiting. The junior physician must immediately intervene to cancel the erroneous order. Once the patient is safe, the physician must report the impaired colleague to the appropriate institutional authority, such as the clinic's medical director, the chief of staff, or a physician health program. These bodies have the resources to properly evaluate the physician, mandate administrative leave if necessary, and ensure ongoing patient safety.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the immediate clinical threat.
A dangerous chemotherapy order has been placed for a waiting patient.
The primary duty of a physician is to do no harm; acute threats to patients must be addressed before administrative tasks.
2
Recognize the signs of physician impairment.
The senior partner is showing overt signs of progressive neurocognitive decline, such as memory lapses and severe disorientation.
Identifying the impairment dictates the appropriate ethical reporting pathway.
3
Determine the required ethical sequence of actions.
Intervene immediately to cancel the order, then report the physician to the institutional authority.
Patient safety is secured first, followed by institutional reporting (e.g., to the medical director) to initiate a formal health evaluation.

Key Concept

When dealing with an impaired physician, the absolute first priority is immediate patient safety (preventing harm), followed immediately by reporting the impairment to the appropriate institutional authority (e.g., medical director, chief of staff, or physician health program).
Rate this question

Topics

Physician Impairment and Peer Reporting

More questions from this topic