Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumTransitions of Care and Handoff Protocols

A first-year internal medicine resident is receiving a telephone sign-out from an emergency department physician regarding a 54-year-old man being admitted for melena and suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The patient's initial hemoglobin was 8.2 g/dL. He has received intravenous pantoprazole and 1 liter of normal saline. His vital signs are currently stable. During the transition of care, the emergency physician provides a brief clinical summary and states, "He is stable now and resting comfortably. We have typed and crossed him for 2 units of packed red blood cells. Just keep a close eye on him tonight, and if his hemoglobin drops further or he looks worse, go ahead and transfuse him." Which of the following is the most appropriate next step by the receiving resident to optimize patient safety during this handoff?

  1. A
    Accept the sign-out as provided and rely on standard inpatient nursing protocols to trigger a transfusion if the patient deteriorates.
  2. B
    Request that the patient remain in the emergency department until a diagnostic upper endoscopy confirms the bleeding source.
  3. Clarify the contingency plan by proposing specific hemoglobin and vital sign thresholds that would prompt a transfusion.Answer
  4. D
    Prescribe a non-selective beta-blocker prior to the patient's transfer to prevent potential variceal hemorrhage.
  5. E
    Recommend discharging the patient with expedited outpatient gastroenterology follow-up given his current hemodynamic stability.

Answer

The receiving physician should clarify the contingency plan by establishing specific, objective thresholds (such as a precise hemoglobin level or vital sign parameters) that would necessitate a blood transfusion.
Handoff errors frequently occur due to ambiguous contingency plans and the omission of explicit 'if-then' directives. The I-PASS framework and Joint Commission mandate the use of structured handoffs that include specific, actionable contingency planning (the 'Anticipatory Guidance' component). The receiving physician must use interactive questioning to establish clear clinical thresholds (e.g., transfuse if hemoglobin drops below 7.0 g/dL or if the patient develops hypotension or tachycardia) to prevent adverse events. Clarifying these thresholds ensures both teams share a common mental model regarding the patient's management.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the handoff communication provided by the sending physician.
The emergency physician provided an ambiguous contingency plan ('if his hemoglobin drops further or he looks worse').
Identifying vulnerabilities in communication is the first step in applying patient safety frameworks during transitions of care.
2
Determine the appropriate systemic countermeasure for an ambiguous contingency plan.
The receiver must use interactive questioning to establish concrete, objective 'if-then' parameters.
Standardized handoff protocols (e.g., I-PASS) require explicit anticipatory guidance to ensure the receiving team knows exactly when and how to intervene if the patient's condition changes.

Key Concept

Standardized handoffs require explicit, unambiguous contingency plans (e.g., 'if-then' statements with specific clinical thresholds) and interactive questioning to prevent communication errors during care transitions.
Rate this question

Topics

Transitions of Care and Handoff Protocols

More questions from this topic