Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumEnd-of-Life and Palliative Care

A 70-year-old man is admitted to the medical intensive care unit with severe septic shock secondary to ischemic bowel. He is endotracheally intubated, hemodynamically unstable, and lacks decision-making capacity. His clinical condition is rapidly deteriorating despite maximal medical therapy. The primary care team determines that a discussion regarding the potential withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and transition to comfort-focused care is medically indicated. A thorough chart review confirms the patient has no documented advance directive and has not explicitly designated a healthcare proxy. Several individuals have arrived at the intensive care unit, each asserting their right to make medical decisions on the patient's behalf. According to the standard legal hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers in most United States jurisdictions, arrange the following individuals in the correct order of priority to act as the patient's surrogate, from highest priority (first) to lowest priority (last).

  1. 1A court-appointed legal guardian
  2. 2The patient's legally married spouse
  3. 3The patient's adult child
  4. 4The patient's parent
  5. 5The patient's adult sibling

Answer

The correct order of surrogate priority is: 1. Court-appointed legal guardian, 2. Legally married spouse, 3. Adult child, 4. Parent, 5. Adult sibling.
When a patient lacks decision-making capacity and has not legally designated a healthcare proxy (e.g., durable power of attorney for healthcare), medical professionals must turn to a default surrogate decision-maker. In the United States, most states follow a hierarchy similar to the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act. A court-appointed guardian with healthcare authority always holds the highest priority. If no guardian exists, the legally married spouse is the highest-priority family member. If there is no spouse (or the spouse is unavailable), decision-making falls to adult children. If there are no adult children, parents are next in line, followed finally by adult siblings. Understanding this exact sequence is critical in intensive care and palliative settings to ensure ethical and legally sound goals-of-care discussions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Assess the patient's decision-making capacity and check for advance directives.
The patient lacks capacity and has no advance directive or designated healthcare power of attorney.
A patient with capacity makes their own decisions. If capacity is lost, a designated proxy is consulted first. Without one, the legal default surrogate hierarchy must be utilized.
2
Apply the statutory hierarchy of default surrogate decision-makers.
The legal priority follows the Uniform Health-Care Decisions Act standard: Guardian -> Spouse -> Adult Child -> Parent -> Sibling.
This standardized hierarchy prevents arbitrary decision-making and ensures that the person presumed to be closest to the patient directs their medical care.

Key Concept

Hierarchy of default surrogate decision-makers
Rate this question

Topics

End-of-Life and Palliative Care

More questions from this topic