A hospital quality improvement committee is evaluating a novel automated sepsis alert protocol designed to reduce the time from triage to intravenous antibiotic administration in the emergency department. After 4 months, a preliminary analysis of 120 patients (60 pre-intervention and 60 post-intervention) shows a reduction in mean time to antibiotics of 12 minutes (). The committee strongly suspects the alert protocol is clinically effective but notes there is wide variability in how nurses manually recorded the antibiotic administration times during both study periods. Assuming the novel protocol is genuinely effective, which of the following design or analytical modifications would most likely increase the study's statistical power to detect this difference in future phases?
- ALowering the significance threshold () from 0.05 to 0.01 for the final statistical analysis
- BBroadening the inclusion criteria to encompass any patient presenting with isolated, non-diagnostic laboratory abnormalities
- CTransitioning the primary study endpoint from a continuous time variable to the positive predictive value of the sepsis alert
- Implementing an automated barcode medication scanner to strictly log the exact time of antibiotic deliveryAnswer
- EConducting a stratified analysis to report identified confounding variables as effect modifiers