A 45-year-old man undergoes an uncomplicated outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Upon discharge, the surgeon uses the electronic health record (EHR) to prescribe oral hydromorphone for pain management. However, the EHR interface defaults to a continuous intravenous infusion order set for this medication. The surgeon overrides a generic warning alert without reading it, assuming it to be a routine nuisance alarm. The outpatient pharmacy receives the order, assumes it is meant to be a concentrated liquid formulation, and dispenses it to the patient with oral dosing instructions. The patient subsequently suffers a massive overdose, resulting in respiratory arrest at home that requires emergency intubation. A multidisciplinary patient safety committee is convened to review the incident. The committee identifies the EHR default setting and the surgeon's alert fatigue as primary contributing factors. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step for the committee to recommend?
- Implement a forcing function within the EHR that physically prevents the authorization of continuous intravenous opioid infusions for outpatient discharge prescriptionsAnswer
- BTransition the investigation into a failure mode and effects analysis to retrospectively determine how the EHR interface error originally occurred
- CConclude the analysis and report the findings, as the physician's unread alert override represents the definitive root cause of the adverse event
- DAddress the alert fatigue by replacing the generic warning with a high-priority interruptive alert specifically detailing absolute pharmacologic contraindications to hydromorphone
- EMandate the use of a standardized verbal handoff protocol between the discharging physician and the outpatient dispensing pharmacist for all high-risk medications