Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumMedical Errors and Malpractice

A geriatrician provides care for patients at a local long-term care facility. During morning rounds, the physician prescribes oral azithromycin for an 82-year-old resident with a suspected lower respiratory tract infection. Several hours later, while reviewing the patient's comprehensive chart, the physician realizes that the patient has a documented history of severe QT interval prolongation and is concurrently taking sotalol. The electronic health record had generated a warning about this interaction, but the physician inadvertently bypassed it due to alert fatigue. The patient has received one dose of the antibiotic but currently remains asymptomatic. The physician immediately discontinues the azithromycin, and a stat electrocardiogram shows no acute changes or arrhythmias. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in managing this medical error?

  1. Disclose the prescribing oversight to the patient, explain the change in the treatment plan, and file an internal safety incident reportAnswer
  2. B
    Resume the azithromycin and sotalol combination because the initial electrocardiogram showed no acute changes
  3. C
    Initiate a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis to retrospectively investigate why the electronic alert was bypassed
  4. D
    File a mandatory report with state adult protective services regarding potential pharmacological endangerment
  5. E
    Delay disclosure of the oversight until a judge can formally determine the patient's legal competence to understand the medical information

Answer

The most appropriate action is to fully disclose the prescribing oversight to the patient, explain why the treatment plan is changing, and file an internal safety incident report with the facility.
The correct action follows the core ethical principles of error disclosure. Physicians have an ethical obligation to disclose all medical errors to patients, including near misses and errors that do not result in clinical harm. The disclosure should be prompt, transparent, and include an apology, an explanation of what happened, and a description of the steps being taken to mitigate any risk. Furthermore, filing an internal incident report is crucial for patient safety, as it triggers institutional review mechanisms (such as a Root Cause Analysis) to identify and correct systemic vulnerabilities, like the alert fatigue that contributed to this event.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the nature of the event.
The physician made a prescribing error (ignoring an alert) that reached the patient (one dose administered) but caused no immediate harm (asymptomatic, normal ECG).
Categorizing the event determines the ethical and systemic obligations required for follow-up.
2
Determine the ethical obligation to the patient.
The standard of care mandates transparency; the patient must be informed of the error, the potential risks, and the corrective actions taken.
Patient autonomy and the physician-patient relationship rely on honesty, even when an error does not result in adverse clinical outcomes.
3
Determine the institutional obligation.
The physician must file an incident report.
Reporting allows the facility's quality improvement committee to perform a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to address systemic issues like alert fatigue.

Key Concept

Medical Error Disclosure and Incident Reporting
Rate this question

Topics

Medical Errors and Malpractice

More questions from this topic